* “In praise of short books.” No argument here. I’d rather write, “In praise of books that are the right length for their material,” which may be short (Rapture is short) or long (Cryptonomicon is long).
* Math journal editors resign to start rival journal that will be free to read.
* “Apple and other tech companies are fighting to keep devices hard to repair.” It’s not hard to understand why.
* Ninni Holmqvist’s novel The Unit imagines a dystopia for the childless.
* “Why We Can’t Have the Male Pill: A condom alternative could be worth billions. What’s taking so long?”
* “Why I left Academia: Part I.” This is an impressively brazen and horrible story and maybe the worst I’ve heard. One of the (many) reasons not to go to grad school in the humanities is that a single person can so easily halt or retard your progress. That’s rarely if ever true in the rest of the working world.
* “Trump’s Fledgling Presidency Has Already Collapsed.” Seems overly optimistic to me.
* “Modern American elites have come to favour inconspicuous consumption.” Seems like conspicuous precision is an improvement on conspicuous consumption.
* Google promotes and enforces politically correct monoculture, although the headline is different. Or maybe no one comes out looking good. It’s disappointing to read so few sentences like, “I think it’s really important to discuss this topic scientifically, keeping an open mind and using informed skepticism when evaluating claims about evidence,” even if I’m not sure the evidence is as strong as claimed at the link.