* “Teaching Madame Bovary,” a marvelous essay, and I would add that students like to judge before understanding. In this they’re only supported by the entire culture. But one thing instructors can and should ask for is understanding, and only after that judgment. Maybe I make the same error.
* “Bitter pill,” on second-, third-, and fourth-order effects from reliable contraception; not much of my views in it but consistently interesting and plausible.
* Douthat asks, “What’s the Matter With Republicans?”
* “Five reasons why Amsterdam works so well for bikes.” Note that any American city could copy all five factors.
* “The Broken Check and Balance,” on how the Constitution is ill-suited to today’s U.S., which is polarized as has rarely if ever happened before.
* The fax of life: It’s 2017. American medicine still runs on fax machines because doctors and administrators think that making medical records easier to transfer will make patients change providers more easily. In other words, this is yet another patient-unfriendly, anti-competitive part of the healthcare landscape.
* “Philosophy Professor Tells Bisexual Student Who Criticized Islam ‘We’re Not Going to Let You Damage the Program.'” Wow, if true, and yet secret recordings are also not good.
* “Many Academics Are Eager to Publish in Worthless Journals.” This time from the NYT.
* “When the Academy Retreats: Thought-policing and value-signaling are pre-empting free and open discussion on college campuses.” It’s pretty depressing that we’re still fighting for free speech in 2017.
* “Meet the startups fighting Bay Area’s soaring housing costs.” These efforts are useful but pretty marginal; the basic problem remains: it’s illegal to build the housing that people want to live in.
* “Seven megatrends that could beat global warming: ‘There is reason for hope.'”
* “Forfeiting The Patriarchal Dividend,” a piece likely to anger some of you and not necessarily my view.