* Gravity is the best movie I’ve seen in a long time and possibly the first to really make 3-D live up to its possibilities (Avatar, discussed at the link, was okay but overrated).
* Most movies described as “thrillers” use the term to connote a serial killer or supernatural beast or government conspiracy as the generator of primal fear of death, and yet to me they aren’t all that thrilling. Most feel silly and artificial. By contrast Gravity is one of the tensest, thrilling movies I’ve seen.
* The movie feels big—sublime, even.
* Few narrative works, whether movies or novels or TV shows, are genuinely about man versus nature.
* Few contemporary narrative works glorify astronauts or scientists (Contagion is an exception) or make people want to be one. Gravity is an exception. I’m amazed that it got made at all.
* One underlying message may say that we have to get off this planet or die on it or die trying. Rebirth is a potent motif in narrative art, as observed by Campbell, Frazer, and others; one could even argue that birth is a dominant motif in evolutionary biology. In Gravity it is enable by technology.
I definitely agree with the thrilling part, the whole movie was more intense than anything I’ve seen this year. On the other hand, I don’t know if I would feel the same way if I watched it again.
Pingback: Movies as Modern Visual Art: Paglia, Stephenson, Cowen | The Story's Story
Pingback: Thoughts on the movie “Arrival” « The Story's Story